Thoughts and Critiques

A blog about theater and the arts

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Archives

Theater, London

The Boy Went to Bed: The Erlkings Perform Schubert

by Lisa on February 15, 2026 posted in Theater, London

On January 31, my friends and I marked Schubert’s birthday listening to a remarkable quartet, the Erlkings, at Wigmore Hall in London.

This crossover band from Austria is fronted by an American baritone/guitarist who sings everything in English translation. They specialize in Schubert (their name comes, of course, from “Der Erlkönig,” one of his small masterpieces), but they have branched out into Schumann and Beethoven as well, taking early 19th-century art songs and turning them into contemporary popular song.

Well, that makes them sound just a bit horrible to a lover of Schubert like myself, but—trust me!—they’re splendid, thoughtful interpreters of the songs. Or don’t trust me, and see for yourself on the streaming platform of your choice.

The reason I’m writing about them now, though, is the way their performance of that namesake song has been sticking in my head. “Der Erlkönig,” if you don’t know it, is a poem by Goethe, best known today through its terrifying musical setting by Schubert. A father rides through the night with his feverish child, who sees and hears the seductive, menacing Erlking—an otherworldly figure who coaxes, cajoles, and finally threatens him. The accompaniment’s relentless gallop—cello, tuba, and percussion here taking the place of Schubert’s fortepiano—mimics the horse’s hooves while the singer rapidly alternates between narrator, father, son, and Erlking. The father finally reaches his home, but the song ends brutally: “In his arms the child was dead.”

But when Brian Benner reached the end of the song in the performance I attended, instead of “the boy was dead,” he sang, “the boy went to bed.”

Continue

Evil Comes to Town: High Noon and Kenrex

by Lisa on February 5, 2026 posted in Theater, London

One plays in the West End at the prestigious Harold Pinter Theatre and stars Billy Crudup and Denise Gough. The other plays at The Other Palace, an intimate off-West End venue, and stars Jack Holden and … well, Jack Holden.

High Noon is the prestige offering, and it’s dead on arrival. Like the West End production of Dr. Strangelove several years ago, it takes existing intellectual property and leaves one wondering: who thought this was a good idea? Each film is already perfect on its own; neither needed to be reinterpreted for the stage. (A further question, to which I have no answer, is why I thought I should buy tickets for either of these.)

To be fair, High Noon, like Dr. Strangelove, remains relevant. Writing during the McCarthy era, screenwriter Carl Foreman shaped the film as a commentary on Hollywood at a moment when studio executives readily abandoned artists who ran afoul of HUAC. Foreman himself was blacklisted, moved to London, and had his passport confiscated.

The problem is not that High Noon has nothing to say to us today, but that this production doesn’t seem to know what that is. Like the movie, it unfolds roughly in real time, as Marshall Will Kane waits for his would-be killer to arrive on the noon train. But the play generates no theatrical tension. Billy Crudup—a wonderful actor but an odd choice for the Gary Cooper role—feels more like Cory Ellison on The Morning Show than like the taciturn hero of this story. The supremely talented Denise Gough, in the Grace Kelly role, occasionally sings a line or two of Bruce Springsteen, to no apparent effect.

I can think of a few possible reasons for the choice: Springsteen as American mythmaker or as working-class moralist. But if the director had a clear intention, it never registers theatrically. (And is “I’m on Fire” really the best choice for this Quaker lady?)

Stories of frontier justice depend on tension: the moral, social, physical pressure must continue to build, and here it simply doesn’t. Kenrex, by contrast, puts us on the edge of our seats throughout. Unlike High Noon, it is wildly entertaining.

Continue

A Smudge of Paint on Paper: A Master Revises his Play

by Lisa on February 2, 2026 posted in Theater, London

I’d never before seen Tom Stoppard’s Indian Ink, so I read it ahead of the new production at the Hampstead Theatre. Written around the same time as Arcadia, it touches on some of the same concerns, particularly Stoppard’s suspicion of scholars who confidently gather the traces of their subjects’ lives into interpretive edifices of biography. Hermione Lee—Stoppard’s own very fine biographer—notes that this was also the moment when Stoppard himself began to worry about how his life would be told.

Like Arcadia, Indian Ink tells its story via two time frames. A young and tubercular Bloomsbury poet, Flora Crewe, goes to India for her health (“Have you seen the British Cemetery?” asks the incredulous British Resident’s attaché.) On the other side of the stage, we see in the present day her surviving sister, now an elderly woman, providing tea and cake to the bumptious American biographer who presses her for more information about the poet who died young in India.

Continue

Life is in the Minding: Stoppard’s Invention of Love at the Hampstead

by Lisa on April 16, 2025 posted in Theater, London

Classicists know A.E. Housman as the most brilliant Latinist of the late Victorian era. General readers—if they know of Housman at all today—know him as a poet, author of A Shropshire Lad, a set of elegiac poems about young men and missed chances.

Tom Stoppard’s moving play about Housman explores this divided self—romantic poet and scrupulous scholar—pulled between two passions: one for scholarship, the other for a more forbidden love. He does this in part by putting two versions of his protagonist on stage.

There’s the elderly Housman (“AEH”), first seen bantering with the mythical boatman Charon and then encountering his younger self as he takes an imaginative voyage across the Styx, revisiting memories as he nears the end of his life. And there’s the younger self (“Housman”), the university student passionately devoted to classical scholarship—and to his roommate Moses Jackson.

Continue

Daniel Fish’s Elektra: Brie Larson, a paint gun and Chekhov’s Blimp

by Lisa on February 24, 2025 posted in Theater, London

Whatever you may think of Daniel Fish’s bizarre staging of Sophocles’ Elektra, Brie Larson shows herself to be not just a movie star but the real deal on stage as well. In a buzzcut, Bikini Kill T-shirt and a microphone, Larson spends most of this production addressing us from downstage left, a mesmerizing standup tragedienne.

It’s a mannered but powerful performance of Anne Carson’s text, itself a mannered but powerful translation from the original Greek. The choice of “Elektra” rather than “Electra” is a conscious rejection of centuries of tradition. And I found the strangeness of this production a welcome reminder that the ancient Greeks are deeply foreign to our modern understanding.

The odd staging includes a blimp suspended above the stage, a curtain covering the back wall that rises and falls at random moments, a revolve with a stage light, a paint gun, other things I couldn’t quite identify. Much of this is incomprehensible. The paint gun gradually stains everyone’s costume with an inky black paint, suggestive of the dark desire for vengeance that drives the plot. 

Continue

The Years: one woman’s story

by Lisa on February 13, 2025 posted in Theater, London

Sheets. Sheets and a table are nearly all that five remarkable actresses need to tell the story of a woman’s life over more than sixty years, from 1940 to the early 2000s.

The Years is an adaptation of Annie Ernaux’s memoir Les Années, a memoir that is both personal and collective. While recounting details of her own life, she intersperses these personal memories with details of the social and cultural life around her, telling a collective history of women over her lifetime, one woman standing in for all of us. Ernaux herself describes the book as “a slippery narrative,” one that is “composed in an unremitting continuous tense, absolute, devouring the present as it goes.”

It’s not obvious how such a work can work on stage. The first brilliant stroke of the adaptor, Eline Arbo, is to hand this “slippery narrative” over to an ensemble of five women, aged 25 to 77, who will each hand the story off to the next older woman as we progress through time.

Continue

A Pretty Wild(e) Importance of Being Earnest

by Lisa on January 27, 2025 posted in Theater, London

Everyone is having a grand time on stage in Max Webster’s exuberant new production of The Importance of Being Earnest at the Lyttelton Theatre (NT Live will show it in movie theaters in February).

And I enjoyed myself very much, too—if not, perhaps, quite as much as everyone on stage. The cast—all of them outstanding—has mastered a particular style of British comedy: part panto, part public school gender subversion and part, of course, Oscar Wilde.

It’s a dream cast: sexy Ncuti Gatwa as Algernon, hapless Hugh Skinner as Jack, randy Ronke Adekoluejo and Eliza Scanlon as their love objects, and the incomparable Sharon D. Clarke as Lady Bracknell. Amanda Lawrence, Richard Cant and Julian Bleach provide luxury casting in the smaller roles.

Having become a bit wearied of the tendency toward minimal sets and costumes, I was delighted by the explosion of color and detail in this production. Did the National blow its entire year’s budget on this show? If so, I’m glad to have been the beneficiary of such a profusion of design talent.

Continue

Why Should I Dance? Oedipus at the Old Vic

by Lisa on January 26, 2025 posted in Theater, London

Oedipus is famous for his ability to solve riddles. I’m in need of an Oedipus to solve the riddle of this production.

The creative team (Ella Hickson has written the adaptation, Matthew Warchus and the choreographer Hofesh Shechter co-direct) has set the play in an undefined time—post-apocalyptic, or post-climate catastrophe. The plague afflicting Thebes is now a drought and a harsh sun shines over a largely empty stage. Jocasta tries to convince Oedipus to abandon Thebes for a less drought-stricken area. Technology has taken a step back: the oracle’s pronouncements are delivered via an old reel-to-reel tape recorder!

So far so good. But what might one do with the Greek chorus in such a concept? The solution chosen here is to eliminate the text of the choruses entirely and bring in Shechter’s dance company to “comment” via dance on the action.

Continue

“Paul Mescal rides ‘A Streetcar Named Desire’ to Brooklyn”

by Lisa on January 15, 2025 posted in Theater, London, Theater, New York

So announces the New York Times headline. Meanwhile, Vulture reports that the “Irish sad-boy hunk of Normal People and Gladiator II … is bringing the production to Brooklyn.”

It is true that Rebecca Frecknall’s production of A Streetcar Named Desire is transferring from London (where I saw it two years ago at the Almeida Theatre) and will open at the Brooklyn Academy of Music in February. And it is true that Mescal will reprise his award-winning performance as Stanley.

What bothers me about the breathless Paul Mescal coverage, though, is that he forms just a third of a remarkable ensemble of award-winning actors that includes Patsy Ferran as Blanche and Anjana Vasan as Stella. 

And good as Mescal is, this revelatory production foregrounds the relationship between Stella and Blanche, suggesting that the heart of the play lies not in the gladiatorial combat between Stanley and Blanche—exciting as that is!—but in the relationship between the two sisters.

Continue

Burton and Gielgud square off in The Motive and the Cue

by Lisa on February 18, 2024 posted in Theater, London

What’s Hecuba to him, or he to Hecuba,/That he should weep for her?/ What would he do/Had he the motive and the cue for passion/That I have?

Hamlet II.2

Jack Thorne’s new play,The Motive and the Cue, takes its title from Hamlet’s amazed reaction to the power actors can bring to feelings that are artificial, merely imagined, “in a fiction, in a dream of passion,” as Hamlet says. What might they do had they what he calls “the motive and the cue” engendered by real suffering?

The play reimagines the rehearsal process for a production of Hamlet, where we’re witnesses to multiple layers of imagination and artifice. Two contemporary actors—Mark Gatiss and Johnny Flynn—portray two legendary actors—John Gielgud and Richard Burton—as they clash over how to portray Hamlet, himself a character notoriously committed to artifice and pretense. 

For all Hamlet’s astonishment that the players can mimic deep emotion so effectively, he also understands that pretense may reveal the truth—which is why he instructs the players to present a specific play to the king in hopes of provoking an emotional reaction that will prove his guilt.

It’s why we continue to go to the theater—presumably not to reveal ourselves as murderers like Claudius, but to experience the deep emotional reaction that actors provoke in us. 

And Gatiss and Flynn are two actors at the top of their game. Add Tuppence Middleton as Elizabeth Taylor holed up in a luxurious hotel suite while her new husband rehearses, and we have a splendid trio of performances.

Continue

Next

Subscribe

Enter email to receive notifications of new posts.

Join 26 other subscribers

Categories

  • Art
  • French
  • Theater, London
  • Theater, New York
  • Theater, Other

Social

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
© 2026 Thoughts and Critiques. Less Theme by SPYR
✕
  • Twitter
  • Facebook