I have a sneaking feeling that the Cambridge audience at the ART’s stellar production of Ionesco’s Rhinoceros should perhaps have found it more disturbing than they did.
It’s not that they weren’t disturbed by the striking move Ionesco makes from farce to horror, but it can be a bit too easy to see the fable as one that depicts how other people—certainly not us!—conform and adapt to a new political and social reality.
To back up, in case you haven’t read or seen Rhinoceros lately: Ionesco, one of the great practitioners of the French Theater of the Absurd, wrote the play in 1959, drawing on his experience of the growth of fascism in the 1930s as well as on the French intellectual embrace of Stalinism in the 1950s.
The play begins like a bit of drawing-room comedy, or better (it is French, after all), as a café comedy. Friends Jean and Berenger (Paul Giamatti and John Turturro, both outstanding) meet for a drink at a café in the center of their provincial small town. As the buttoned-up Jean berates his disheveled friend, they are interrupted by a rhinoceros running through town. Then another. Or was it the same one, coming back from the opposite direction? Did the first have one horn and the second two horns, and does that mean the one is African and the other Asiatic? Or the other way around?









